The decrees and orders validating act 1936 Kent england sex free hookup sites

Rated 4.36/5 based on 920 customer reviews

1956.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------No decree passed or order made by the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, the High Court of Judicature at Madras or the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in the exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction under clause 12 of its Letters Patent, or by the High Court of Judicature at Rangoon, in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction under clause 10 of its Letters Patent, shall be called in question in any proceedings before any other Court on the ground that the High Court passing the decree or making the order had no jurisdiction to pass or make the decree or order. THE DECREES AND ORDERS VALIDATING ACT.1936 ACT No.5 OF 1936 [AS ON 1956] An Act to remove certain doubts and to establish the validity of certain proceedings in High Courts of Judicature [26th April, 1936.] WHEREAS doubts have arisen as to the validity of certain proceedings in High Courts of Judicature under the Letters Patent erecting and establishing those Courts; AND WHEREAS it is expedient to terminate those doubts and to establish the validity of those proceedings; It is hereby enacted as follows:- 1.its enabling provisions are open to doubt or when in giving full effect to their meaning a court may be faced with the situation of having to express against its validity, rule g., on the ground of its being ultra vires of the body which passed it.18. objections need not be raised on the ground that objections need not be raised because of the invalidity of the schemes the validating act can at best validate of the preparation of the schemes under sub-section (3) and the publications under sub-section (4) must either be made afresh or at least a fresh period should be prescribed within which objections can be filed ..... Reported in : AIR1996SC3063; JT1995(7)SC130; 1995(5)SCALE424; (1995)6SCC242; [1995]Supp3SCR816; 1996(1)SLJ180(SC) .....

Certain decrees and orders not to be called in question.-No decree passed or order made by the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, the High Court of Judicature at Madras or the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in the exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction under clause 12 of its Letters Patent, or by the High Court of Judicature at Rangoon, in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction under clause 10 of its Letters Patent, shall be called in question in any proceedings before any other Court on the ground that the High Court passing the decree or making the order had no jurisdiction to pass or make the decree or order. Restoration of proceedings.-Where in any proceedings concluded on or after the 26th day of August, 1935, any such decree or order has been found to be invalid on such ground by any Court, such finding shall be void and of no effect; and the Court shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908), or any other law for the time being in force, on application made within six months from the commencement of this Act by any person prejudicially affected by such finding, restore the proceedings at and continue the proceedings from the state reached immediately before the order embodying or based on such finding was made. Because while there is only one Quran and one Prophet Muhammad, there is tremendous variety in the types of interpretations that so-called Muslims make out of this book and this great social-reformer.In short, Islam is not as monolithic as it appears to be.THE DECREES AND ORDERS VALIDATING ACT, 1936 ACT NO. 5 OF 1936* [26th April, 1936.] An Act to remove certain doubts and to establish the validity of certain proceedings in High Courts of Judicature 1***.

Leave a Reply